http://www.espn.com/video/clip?id=31837700
This is what happens when a country raises a couple of generations of drug addicts. People can't enjoy anything.
People need to raise the bar raising their kids. Not set it as low as they can.
#washington #nationals #addicts #drugs #violence
https://www.foxnews.com/politi....cs/white-house-criti
After completely selling out to the Democrats, Facebook gets it's ass handed to it.
Come 2024, I fully expect Zuckerberg to stick to his ethical levels and sell completely out to the Democrats again.
https://www.politico.com/news/....2021/07/13/mayorkas-
President Joe and President Assumed Akamala doesn't see how amazingly blatantly hypocritical this is.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/unc....le-infant-shot-chica
Biden and Harris will have to break from their party that has empowered thugs. criminals, and at-risk youths for the last five years under the auspices of being "woke". Young adults push the limits as far as they can. Biden's party removed those limits. Toss in a generation of absent parents and this is what you get.
A quick start is ditching all this crap about defunding the police. It's not the police committing all these murders. It's Biden's assumed voter base.
And what do I think the chances are Biden will suddenly grow a spine?
https://www.foxnews.com/politi....cs/trump-to-sue-face
Depending on the route he takes, I think Trump very possibly could win this. It's not so much a "private" versus "Public" debate, it's a matter of these various platforms agreeing to the terms of Section 230.
https://www.cnet.com/news/what....s-section-230-the-so
According to the terms of Section 230, the government protects these platforms in order to assure freedom of speech within some legal restraints. Primarily Section 230 protects platforms from liability of their clients' posts. Because of that, Twitter, Facebook, Youtube, any of them, never had any reason at all to censure "misleading" posts, or even have fact-checkers at all. That completely undermines the rules of Section 230. If they are willing to completely ignore the terms of Section 230, then it can be argued they are not protected by Section 230. Enter Trump's lawsuit. If he can prove they infringed his government protected right to free speech, he has a massive lawsuit against every one of them. And, not only that, every user that has been censored in any way has as well. And the beauty of all this Zuckerberg et al went to DC a year ago to argue how desperately they had to have Section 230 kept in place. And thanks to Nancy Pelosi, it still is.
