Hold aside the galling hypocrisy of the purported party of "democracy" trying to remove Trump from the ballot under an outlandish theory while simultaneously attempting to bankrupt, prosecute, and incarcerate him on equally spurious grounds. Hold aside the self-proclaimed party of "democracy" feigning ignorance over how its overheated rhetoric laid the seeds for their political opponent's recent near-assassination, and its continuing to lie and depict that opponent as an existential threat to the American constitutional order. And hold aside that purportedly "democratic" party deposing its own presumptive elected nominee—a stark reversal from its presidential primary, when party elites worked hard to shut out all viable competition. Hold all that aside because even on its own terms, the coup of biden for cackler-in-chief kamala harris is going to backfire on the left-wing/democrats.

Already, left-wing/democrats and their media have been working hard to "define" harris for the American people. At times, this has included some rather dubious retconning, such as magically pretending she wasn't the biden regime's"border czar." She was! But the even bigger problem for libs/dems is that harris is not an unknown commodity. On the contrary, she is a very well-known commodity—one who just happens to be about as popular with the American public as venereal disease.

harris' average approval rating is under 38%, and an NBs News poll found her to be the single least popular VP in American history—only 32% of Americans had a positive view of her. harris' 2020 only presidential campaign was an absolute dud, self-imploding well before the 1st primary votes were cast. And as recently, left-wing/democrat elites were openly discussing whether she could still be dropped as ol' bden's 2024 running mate. Funny how quickly the lyin' left-wing/democrat can go from weakest link to great savior of "Our Democracy."

The path to winning 270 Electoral College votes still runs through the Rust Belt states of Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin. It is frankly bizarre for libs/dems to swap out the man who talks ceaselessly about his hardscrabble Scranton upbringing for a Californian who boasts the most left-wing voting record of any presidential nominee in modern history. Do libs/dems really think harris' support for the green new deal and a national fracking ban will play well in the Marcellus Shale of Pennsylvania, or in the auto factories of Detroit? Will working- and middle-class voters concerned about skyrocketing crime look favorably upon harris' enthusiastic support for the 2020 black lives matter riots, which racked up $2 billion worth of property damage and violent assaults and even deaths?

It's not that corrupt biden, seemingly about to keel over and die at any moment, found himself in much better political shape. But in addition to the gross hypocrisy of their coup that has dealt yet another fatal blow to their specious claim to "defend democracy," left-wing/democrats have also set themselves up for political failure to come. The 14 million people who voted for biden in the left-wing/democratic primaries ought to be livid.

Supplemental info:
https://townhall.com/columnist....s/victordavishanson/

CONTINUED...

Bitte melde dich zuerst an!

More of kammie's lies:

jussie smollett
"jussie smollett is one of the kindest, most gentle human beings I know" harris wrote. it was all an elaborate lie. smollett had hired 2 black friends to stage an attack on him to garner public sympathy. He was convicted of making false statements to police and sentenced to 150 days in jail. harris lightly criticized smollett after his ruse was exposed, saying she was "sad, disappointed, and frustrated." But harris, the former attorney general of California, quickly pivoted to using smollett’s lie as a teachable moment about the scourge of legitimate hate crimes across the country. "At the same time, we must speak the truth: hate crimes are on the rise in America," said harris, who has repeatedly dodged questions about her facilitation of the smollett hoax.

Horse-riding border agents whipped Haitian migrants
In 2021, photographs went viral of horse-riding Customs and Border Protection agents attempting to round up a group of Haitian migrants who had illegally crossed the U.S.-Mexico border. It stoked outcry from liberals, who claimed the photos showed the agents using whips to hunt down black migrants—evoking images of the slave patrols of yesteryear. harris, the "border czar," joined in the fray, accusing the federal agents of "horrible" atrocities against the Haitian migrants. "But human beings should never be treated that way and I am deeply troubled by it" said harris, who called for a "thorough investigation." An internal investigation debunked all of the most serious allegations against the border agents, the supposed whips seen in photographs were actually reins for the horses, which border agents often ride in rough terrain. "The investigation found no evidence that agents struck any person with horse reins." Not only were the migrants unharmed, they were allowed to remain in the US. "There is no evidence that any migrants were forced to return to Mexico or denied entry to the United States," the report said. harris never apologized.

Forced sterilizations’ at Trump-era immigration detention facility
In 2020, a former employee at an Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in Georgia claimed a physician had performed unnecessary hysterectomies on numerous immigrant women. dawn wooten, said the physician in question was referred to by detainees as the "uterus collector." harris joined the frenzy, calling for an investigation into the "horrific allegations." "Forced sterilization has a long and dark history in our country and this must be investigated immediately," said harris. But wooten lied, according to several independent investigations. wooten had no 1st-hand knowledge of the allegations, and had not spoken to any detainees who claimed the physician mistreated them. A left-wing/democrat-led Senate investigation found only 2 hysterectomies, both of which were deemed medically necessary. The physician has sued MSNBs for defamation for airing multiple segments based on wooten’s allegations. Emails revealed through the lawsuit show MSNBs anchors rachel maddow and chris hayes were skeptical, but aired her story anyway. harris never apologized for her role.

michael brown’s ‘murder’
"michael brown’s murder forever changed Ferguson and America," harris wrote in n Aug. 2019, the 5-yr anniversary of brown’s death. Brown’s death was a rallying cry for left-wing activists, and helped spark the black lives matter movement. left-wing/democrats and activists claimed Ferguson police officer Wilson, who is white, murdered the black teenager in cold blood as he held up his arms in surrender, shouting: "Don’t shoot." "His tragic death sparked a desperately needed conversation and a nationwide movement. We must fight for stronger accountability and racial equity in our justice system," harris wrote. But brown was not murdered, and Wilson shot the 19-year-old in self-defense, according to the BObama Justice Dept. brown was far from the gentle giant portrayed by the liberal media. Moments before his encounter with Wilson, brown assaulted a convenience store clerk while stealing cigarettes. When Wilson stopped brown on the street, brown attacked the officer inside his cruiser, grabbed Wilson’s service weapon, and fired it inside the car. brown fled, but then turned around and charged at Wilson, according to eyewitnesses. “Radical” is an apt word for harris’s biased activism. She raised money for arrested rioters whose politics she supported. As riots raged in the summer of 2020, with fire and property damage and violent threats, harris cheered them on.
CONTINUED...

Bitte melde dich zuerst an!

LOL, if only...



https://www.americanthinker.co....m/blog/2024/07/parod

Bitte melde dich zuerst an!

Through the lie of “equity,” kammie harris believes everyone can “end up in the same place.” That’s communism distilled to its most fundamental principle is the pursuit of equality of outcome through impossible utopia of central planning. Would harris describe her belief system as communism? Of course not, but so what? The arbitrary and flattering labels people apply to themselves are meaningless. Your belief system is defined by its ideas. The label harris might give to her belief system is immaterial. harris stating that “people need more so we all end up in the same place” and the phrase “I am a communist” represent a distinction without a difference. Both phrases mean the exact same thing.

It is, of course, impossible for everyone to end up in the same place, but to even attempt this would require government control of every facet of the economy and the categorical elimination of individual rights. Even if harris doesn’t want those things at this very moment, it is her destiny. It has been the destiny of every utopianist who has ever lived.

Because the world neo-liberal harris lusts for is impossible to attain, each law or executive decree will inevitably fail to achieve equality of outcome and will therefore be replaced by a more extreme version of the same policy. It’s not that their idea is fatally flawed they say (every time), it’s that they didn’t go far enough, you see. This trajectory is why all socialist and communist regimes devolve into authoritarian nightmares. We have the bodies to prove it. One hundred & fifty million people were murdered or starved to death in the 20th century in pursuit of “everyone ending up in the same place.” To be fair, they succeeded. Too bad that “same place” ended up being a shallow grave.

When harris isn’t awkwardly laughing when nothing funny has happened, she suffers from these chimerical fantasies as she dreams up a make-believe society in which every human being is given, oh, I don’t know, say $100,000 annually. What charlatans like harris don’t understand is that even in the Candyland world that exists in their futile brains where everyone receives the same income, disparities would emerge immediately as different people have different spending and saving habits. Some would be frugal, others frivolous.

Even if you could snap your fingers and magically equalize earnings, you would be no closer to achieving equality of outcome, but you’d destroy the entire economy in the process, causing mass privation while depriving people of their most basic rights. That’s how the equality of outcome experiment ends. Every. Single. Time.

In kamala karris, the left-wing/democrat finally has a candidate who represents the soul of their Party — a shrill, race-hustling 59-year-old childless woman who sleep her way to the top. A self-righteous but morally vacuous hypocritical idiot. Most of all, what they finally have is a candidate who is willing to admit on video that the Party is headed exactly where we always knew it was headed.

CONTINUED...

Bitte melde dich zuerst an!

The U.S. Dept of Justice regularly performs comprehensive surveys of state and local law enforcement agencies, collected in volumes called Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics.

John Lott Jr. has looked at the actual data, published in Does a Helping Hand Put Others at Risk? Affirmative Action, Police Departments and Crime.

It turns out that, far from “de-escalating force” through their superior listening skills, female law enforcement officers vastly are more likely to shoot civilians than their male counterparts. Especially when perps won’t reveal where they bought a particularly darling pair of shoes.

Unable to use intermediate force, like a bop on the nose, female officers quickly go to fatal force. According to Lott’s analysis, each 1% increase in the number of white female officers in a police force increases the number of shootings of civilians by 2.7%.

Adding white female officers also increases the number of civilians accidentally shot by police. By contrast, adding males to a police force decreases accidental civilian shootings. Adding black males decreases civilian shootings by police even more. Private citizens are much less likely to accidentally shoot someone than are the police, presumably because they do not have to pursue suspects down dark alleys to make an arrest.

In addition to accidentally shooting people, female law enforcement officers are also a lot more likely to be assaulted than male officers — as the whole country saw in Atlanta last week. Lott says: “Increasing the number of female officers by 1 percentage point appears to increase the number of assaults on police by 15% to 19%.”

Of course there are many explanations for why female cops are more likely to be assaulted and to accidentally shoot people, such as that our patriarchal society encourages girls to play with dolls. But we must also consider the fact that women are smaller and weaker than men.

In a study of public safety officers, female officers were found to have 32% to 56% less upper body strength and 18% to 45% less lower body strength than male officers. (But their outfits were 43% more coordinated). See Frank J. Landy, Alternatives to Chronological Age in Determining Standards of Suitability for Public Safety Jobs.

Acknowledging reality wouldn’t be all bad for women. For one thing, they won’t have to confront violent felons on methamphetamine. So that’s a benefit right there. Also, while a sane world would not employ 5-ft-tall grandmothers as law enforcement officers, a sane world would also not give full body-cavity searches to 5-ft-tall grandmothers at airports.

Bitte melde dich zuerst an!