German lawyer Dr. Reiner Fuellmich is filing a class action lawsuit against Norway. Help PassageToLiberty hire him to file such an action against our State and Federal tyrants. Contact us at PassageToLiberty.com to make a donation.
https://greatreject.org/norway-nuremberg-tribunal/
If you've watched news reels of the robotic, group-think behavior of the Chinese under the CCP, this video of children in U.S. government schools blindly obeying "social distancing" mandates will cause you great alarm.
https://twitter.com/Ay5e1/stat....us/13722909672025825
In other words ? https://t.co/kPlcnVlFox
ⓐⓨⓢⓔ (@Ay5e1) March 17, 2021
The State Dept is trying to weasel out of being convicted of civil rights violations in Carmichael v. Pompeo, the passport sans SSN lawsuit
In their recent status report, the government admitted that plaintiffs have already proven their identities and religious convictions in their original passport applications.
"Specifically, based on Plaintiffs’ prior passport submissions and court records, the Department is satisfied with (1) the sincerity of Plaintiffs’ Religious beliefs; and (2) the adequacy of the citizenship and identity evidence previously submitted by each Plaintiff."
https://www.courtlistener.com/........docket/16012806/
They went on to explain that the plaintiffs have no need to submit a SSN in a subsequent filing of passport renewal forms.
However... that is a trick. In "Inviting them to file a new DS-82 passport renewal application" they are baiting the plaintiffs into conceding that the remand order was legitimate, and to abandon the successes that Carmichael et. al. have had so far in the litigation. They've already proven every thing that the plaintiffs needed to prove in their original passport and passport renewal applications. The government violated the law law in their denials of Larry and Williams' renewals and in the revoking of Carmichael's renewed passport.
Plaintiffs' response shows that they are committed for the long-haul fight that is necessary to protect the law and liberty for EVERYONE. It exposes some of the trickery that the government thugs use and explains the solution to the problem.
https://www.courtlistener.com/........docket/16012806/
Thank you for your prayers. Please keep interceding as the plaintiffs hold the thugs' feet to the fire instead of settling out of court.
News Flash regarding CARMICHAEL v. POMPEO
This just hit the docket a few minutes ago:
"MINUTE ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that the government shall submit, on or before March 5, 2021, a status report on the progress of this case on remand since the Court's January 20, 2021 order. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 2/26/2021. (lcrc3) (Entered: 02/26/2021)" (Emphasis added)"
The remand order was January 20th. Two days ago was thirty-six days into the 90-day remand. The plaintiffs pointed out in their DJ motion that they have yet to hear from the agency regarding their supposed "new agency action" upon which they have excused their motion for remand. Normally, such new agency action, giving a new reason why a person can't have a passport without an SSN, would allow 60 days in which to respond or to file and appeal. That 60-day window is not available to the plaintiffs, since the stay for remand expires fifty days from now. Its a scamdemic.
Court Stays Proceedings In Response To Government's Maneuver To Dodge Discovery in the Passports sans SSN case
In our last exciting episode of CARMICHAEL v. POMPEO, the Government moved to dismiss the case a year ago. The Court determined six months later that the RFRA (Religious Freedom Restoration Act), Privacy Act, and Fifth Amendment claims by the plaintiffs are solid. Then, after the plaintiffs delivered a draft of their discovery motion to the U.S. Attorney, along with a list of initial disclosures to which they had obligated themselves, the government came up with a new tactic to dodge accountability.
That brings us to this exciting episode. Remember, the passport renewals were denied and revoked base upon the plaintiffs not signing a form that 44 U.S.C. § 3512 says that we don’t have to sign and that we cannot be penalized for not signing. Some people don’t sign the form for conscience sake since they know that it is unlawful for the government to coerce them into signing the form. For the plaintiffs, instead of signing the form, they put statements like “religious prohibition, 42 U.S.C. § 2000bb” and submitted a declaration that religion prohibits them from identifying with the sort of number (Mark of the Beast/SSN) that the Dept. of State requests in block 5 of the passport form. The government has not yet admitted that it is daily coercing people with the unlawful form, but it had to admit that it never considered a religious accommodation. But knowing that proceeding with discovery is not going to be one bit of help to the defense, the gov attys came up with another guise for subverting the claim: They said, “Oh…. We need to see if we can identify the Plaintiffs without a SSN.” Well they have been identitifying millions of people without an SSN for decades, so the argument is baseless, and the regulations that control the threshold for identification lists a previously issued passport as sufficient (22 C.F.R. 51.23(b). Nonetheless, they’ve convinced the court to stay the proceeding and remand the case to the agency in order to take another wack at the plaintiffs.
Remand to an agency is not horrible if there is a statute and rule of court to provide for the action. However, there is no statute or rule of court (judicial regulation) that authorizes a remand. There is no administrative law tribunal in the agency that the Congress gave original jurisdiction for an adversarial proceeding. The first stop for an adversarial proceeding is the District Court. There is no judicial or statutory quasi-judicial tribunal to which it can be remanded. It is smoke and mirrors.
It is especially insidious since they did a thorough job of verifying their identities for the first issuance of the passports.
Thus, a 44 page Motion For Declaratory Judgment Or Partial Finding Of Facts And Conclusions Of Law Regarding Remand Order Of January 19, 2021 along with its Memorandum In Support was filed yesterday. It is a treatise on Separation of Powers, the grant and limitations upon the court by statute, and the grant and limitations upon the district court by the rules of the Supreme Court . The documents can be obtained from the docket at CARMICHAEL v. POMPEO, 1:19-cv-02316 – CourtListener.com (New Defendant is "Blinken" rather than Pompeo since the administration change)
Providing truth about law and history so that Americans can be delivered from ignorance of, and bondage to, a corrupt legal system that is designed to nourish the Deep State. If you love freedom, like Passage To Liberty.
