This article is from November 2018. It was posted on another platform where I tried to communicate with fellow Patriots, but that platform repeatedly censored me -- without telling me why. I will be moving all of my Notes from there to here in the coming weeks.
I don’t engage with a LIB unless they agree to the following:
- Consistently defend the US Constitution and agree to the method of amending it.
- Consistently promote Free Enterprise and reject government attempts to impose salary restrictions or regulations that force any business to offer specific products and services.
- Consistently nurture Individual Liberty and reject the collective idea that personal sacrifice in areas of wealth, creativity, achievement and success is necessary for the society to advance.
If they can’t agree to those three tenets, there is no discussion beyond a token exchange and tip of the hat goodbye.
Why? Because if we can’t agree on what is American -- on what is the foundation of our country -- then it is like trying to have a discussion with someone from another country or another planet.
The LIB is arguing for what they hope should exist. We argue in favor of current reality and within the current construct, and we also argue for the legal process of change (as in the way to amend the Constitution). LIBs want things to happen outside the scope of the law through some quick fix and without regard to those three tenets and the process for amending the Constitution -- which is why they rely so much on the courts to legislate from the bench. LIBs use what I call the “Nike Way” -- just do it. That was also Obama’s way.
I don’t get involved in their red herrings, obfuscation, straw man arguments, lies and stupid meme responses. LIBs cannot articulate their position beyond the Democrat party talking points of a sentence or two. After that, the name-calling begins, and WE WIN.
